Commercialisation Of Higher Education In South Africa

Commercialisation of Higher Education in Southinstitution of higher education.
Africa· Section D: Four competitive dimensions of
Introduction and Literature Reviewhigher education institutions, including strategic
South African education policies place priority oncompetitiveness, institutional competitiveness,
addressing historical education imbalances,Visitproduct competitiveness, and tactical
Herecompetitiveness.
 but should also be sensitive to the demands of· Section E: Open-ended questions, aimed to
an ever-increasing global knowledge-drivenidentify the reasons why respondents choose a
environment. The educational system cannot bespecific institution of higher education, their opinion
dominated by the needs of the domesticon the institution's competitive reputation, and the
educational system of South Africa ignoring thefactors that may influence the international
trends exerted by the global world (OEDC Annualcompetitiveness of the particular institution.
Report, 2004:44). Higher education in South AfricaThe data was transformed into two opposite
should realize that they operate and function in acategories, namely those who agreed with the
knowledge-driven global environment in which bothstatements and those who disagreed, enabling the
domestic and foreign students demand access toresearchers to derive a hypothesized
the best quality education at the best reputableagreement-disagreement distribution. Those who
institutions of higher education in the world.neither agreed nor disagreed were allocated to
In this regard, most definitions ofthe disagreement group set giving and expected
internationalization of higher education include thedisagreement response set of 57% (p=0.57) and
following: "Internationalisation is a process thatan agreement response set of 43% (q=0.43).
prepares the community for successfulThe Binomial test was employed to determine
participation in an increasingly interdependent worldwhether the observed distribution correspond with
… The process infuse all facets of thethe hypothesized distribution using a significance
post-secondary education system, fostering globaltest level of 0.05. Furthermore, the level of
understanding and developing skills for effectiveagreement or disagreement with the selected
living and working in a diverse world" (Francis,competitive statements and the extend of
1993 cited by Patrick, 1997).agreements between the respondents from the
The position of higher education in South Africadifferent institutions on the various statements
should be evaluated considering the re-integrationwere determined by executing four statistical
of South Africa into the global community. Southprocedures, namely: ANOVA to compare the
Africa was rapidly re-integrated into the worldmeans of respondents from the different
community by obtaining almost immediateinstitutions; determining how much of the
membership of influential international organisationsperception variation could be accounted for by
after 1994. Kishun (1998:59) indicated that Souththe influence of the different institutions of higher
Africa became a member of among others theeducation; determining the averages for each
following international institutions: United Nations;strategic dimension to obtain an indication of the
Organisation of African Unity; Commonwealth;level of agreement with the competitive
International Olympic Committee; Federation ofstatements; and determining the standard
International Football Associations; and Lomedeviations to obtain an indication of the extend to
Convention. Integration of influential internationalwhich consensus exists within the sample.
institutions is a necessary but not sufficientFindings
pre-condition for internationalization of higherWith regard to the strategic competitiveness of
education. Sustainable internationalization should beSouth African institutions of higher education to
closely aligned to the emerging global trends andengage in a seamless network the respondents
events in the education sector.were of the opinion that South African institutions
An analysis of the basis on whichof higher education give low priority to attract
internationalization of higher education occurs isforeign students, are not well known for
needed as well as the benefits of theattracting foreign students, are not actively
internationalization process. This research isinvolved in exchange programmes of students
conducted against this background.and lecturers, and do not have active
Problem Statementengagements or agreements with other tertiary
Whilst South Africa is in a process of transitioninstitutions, businesses and communities.
regarding higher education to address theOn the issue of institutional competitiveness, the
imbalances of the past, the question arisesmajority of respondents were of the opinion that
whether the South African educational sector isinstitutions of higher education in South Africa
able to compete in the global economy whichhave the ability to attract quality students, does
regard knowledge as a commercialisednot have an international student culture, offers
commodity.qualifications that are internationally accepted, can
Methodologyclaim international reputability on post-graduate
A sample size of 781 respondents from sixlevel, offers competitive tuition fees, deliver
institutions of higher education in South Africa wasresearch outputs that are internationally
selected. Senior students were randomly selectedrecognized, and are not easily accessible.
using the convenience sampling technique. AIn terms of product competitiveness the majority
semi-structured questionnaire was developed toof respondents indicated that institutions of higher
measure the perceived competitive profile ofeducation in South Africa have active orientation
institutions of higher education in South Africa. Theprogrammes to familiarise foreign and domestic
questionnaire constitutes five measuring foci,students with the institutions, provide safe and
namely:secure learning environments, provide leading
· Section A: Institutional information regarding theinformation technology for academic growth and
location where the respondent is enrolled.excellence, do not easily adapt to the needs and
· Section B: Biographical information in terms ofwants of students, and provide convenient
gender, type of student and country of origin.service packages to students.
· Section C: Decision criteria used to select an