| Among an array of the theories of the pidgin and | | | | regarding the base language (here, letus wishfully |
| creole languages of the worldassumed, discussed, | | | | suppose that it is Bangla)to be the ultimate single |
| confirmed and dismissed by the international | | | | origin of all the pidginsand creoles generated from |
| sociolinguists eitherthis time or the other, the | | | | Bangla in distant parts of the world. Thus, the |
| polygenesis and monogenesis theories pose | | | | monogenesishypothesis conquers over the |
| counter ratificationto be behind the sociolingustic | | | | polygenesis hypothesis to be the substantiated |
| phenomenon of the world observed by almost all | | | | theory oforigin of pidgins and creoles of the world. |
| thesociolinguists as expressed by Ronald | | | | The monogenesis theory of pidgin and creole |
| Wardhaugh (1986) in his book “An | | | | postulates that pidgins and creoles of theworld |
| Introduction to | | | | can be traced back to a single origin like the |
| Sociolingustics” (72) that “Pidgins from | | | | monogenetic theory of worldlanguage. “In |
| very different parts of the world exhibit | | | | linguistics, monogenism refers to the theory that |
| remarkable similarities in structures even when | | | | all languages derive froma single Proto-World |
| the standard languages they are associated with | | | | language, as opposed to the view that language |
| are quitedifferent. Furthermore, pidgins and | | | | may have evolvedindependently on more than |
| creoles based on the same standar language but | | | | one occasion”(Wikipedia). Therefore, “the |
| found in places far distant from one another may | | | | quest to discover a common origin for pidgins and |
| have a high degree of intelligibility, e.g., the various | | | | creoles –that is the quest for a monogenesis |
| pidginized and creolized varieties of French found | | | | theory oforigin rather than a polygenesis theory |
| geographically as far apart as the Carribean , the | | | | –is now a serious one”(Wardhaugh |
| Indian Ocean ,and the South | | | | 74).Likewise,there must have been a proto-pidgin |
| Pacific.” | | | | from which all the pidgin and creoles of the |
| The antonymous polygenesis and monogenesis | | | | worldare originated and distributed in different |
| theories of the origin of pidgins andcreoles of the | | | | parts of the world. For example, Bangla could |
| world are derived from the anthropological and | | | | have been the supposed proto-pidgin for all the |
| linguistic concepts ofpolygenism and monogenism | | | | probable pidginized and creolized pairs of |
| of races and languages of the world. The | | | | Bangla and other local languages of the distant |
| advocates of polygenesis theories subscribe to | | | | parts of the world. |
| the hypothesis of multiplicity of origins of the | | | | In fact, beside the parallelism of the Biblical |
| pidginsand creoles of the world, a generated | | | | assumption of the origin of the genesis of human |
| reflection of the polygenetic hypothesis of | | | | races and the monogenesis theory of world |
| themultiple origins of the languages of the world | | | | languages ,the monogenesis theory ofpidgins and |
| .For instance, if we suppose for the timebeing | | | | creoles of the world earns its due natural position |
| that Bangla has somehow got the necessitated | | | | of the general acceptance |
| status of being the intermediarybasic linguistic | | | | (ensuring the disconfirmation of the polygenesis |
| means of trade and commerce in a number of | | | | theory)of the sociolinguists. |
| disparate regions of theworld far from each | | | | Bibliography: |
| other, the simplified pidginized forms of it could be | | | | 1.Wardhaugh, Ronald.An Introduction to |
| distinct fromeach other firstly because of their | | | | Sociolinguisctis.Oxford: Blackwell, 1986. |
| distant existences and then because of their | | | | 2.Richards, J.Platt, J and Weber, H. Longman |
| associationwith the varied indigenous languages. | | | | Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. |
| However, the inevitable critical inquiry comes | | | | UK: Longman, 1985. |