What is Ergativity?

'Ergativity' is an umbrella term used in modernbe grouped into five case types. Naturally, every
typological linguistics to cover a variety oflanguage has a lot of possibilities in order of
grammatical phenomena. Basically, ergativity is aexpressing the nominal case marking. Those
grammatical pattern in which nouns are inflectedcomprise: case inflections, particles and adpositions,
or marked for case. Fabricius observed thisword order, cross-referencing and verbal
phenomenon (which he named as nominativusagreement, etc.
transitivus) in Greenlandic Eskimo in 1801, but inThere are two basic types of ergative languages:
fact Adolf Dirr used the term 'ergative' (basedthe classic type and the active-stative type. Let
upon the Greek word "ergon", plural "erga", 'work,us explain:
task') for the first time in 1912. The essential thing· THE CLASSICAL definition says that an
about ergativity is that this pattern challenges aergative language treats the subjects of
universal characterization of "subject". Up to now,intransitive verbs (Si) in the same way as the
Asian, Australian and American (Eskimo, Mayanobjects of transitive verbs (O) - that is, Si/O
and various Ge-Amazonian) languages have beenbehave alike since absolutive zero marks both --,
claimed to have some ergative properties. It isand differently from a transitive subject (St),
interesting to note that ergativity is virtuallywhich receives an ergative special marker. For
nonexistent in Europe (with Basque of theexample, in West Greenlandic Eskimo the ergative
western Pyrenees as the single exception) andmarker is the suffix '-p', whereas in Basque is '-k'.
Africa. Needless to say, ergative languages are still· THE ACTIVE-STATIVE type marks
being discovered.some Si (so-called non-actives or 'unaccusatives')
Quite simply, ergative case occurs on nominalwith O, whereas another class of Si (so-called
case marking on the nouns and/or on the verbalactives/agentives or 'unergatives') has the same
agreement system. To see how this works, letmarking as St. In other words, there are two
us consider first that every natural language hassubgroups of intransitive verbs: 'unaccusative' (e.g.
three types of clause: a minor type and two'sleep') and 'unergative' (e.g. 'dance'). Note that
major types of verbal phrases. These three are:these semantics terms are currently used for
1. EQUATIVE (also equational), which involves twoBasque, which is an ergative active language.
noun phrases (NPs). For example, "My daughter isNow let us consider that since ergative marking
a teacher" (some languages require copula, i.e.may occur also in tripartite languages, as noted
copular verb, like English is; others do not) in whichabove, it follows that there is no absolutive bond
the subject and complement refer to the samein tripartite (O is marked by accusative) and in
person;active (Si is marked by ergative) languages.
2. INTRANSITIVE, which involves a verb and oneHence, we should recognize that the absolutive
core NP (as in "The baby cries") - that is,grouping (Si/O) is not a necessary feature of
intransitive verbs are followed by no obligatoryergative languages.
element; andSince R. M. W. Dixon's classic study on the
3. TRANSITIVE, which involves a verb and twoAustralian language Dyirbal (1972) it is known that
or more core NPs.there are at least two classes of ergative
As a result, every language should always find thelanguages: a small class of syntactically ergative
means to distinguish between the three basiclanguages (also inter-clausal) and a large class of
grammatical categories, namely: intransitivemorphologically ergative languages (also
subject (Si), transitive subject (St), and directintra-clausal). The former show an absolutive
object (O). More precisely, the languages of thepivot, i.e. a grammatical subject grouping (Si/O) on
world use systems of case marking to show theclausal coordination, while the latter have nominal
function of the noun or noun phrase in a clause.case marking and/or verbal agreement or
We can say that the chief function of casecross-referencing of persons on the verbs. For
marking systems is to disambiguate contexts,the most part, morphological ergative languages
which is to permit the hearer to identify themay have both systems at the time, i.e. display
semantic role of the denotation of an NP.ergative pattern for case marking and accusative
Plainly, there are five types of logically possiblefor agreement.
systems for assigning case to Si, St, and O, toFinally, it is need to be stressed that ergative
know: the nominative-accusative (the patternlanguages are never pure. This is because many
known from the major European languages), inlanguages show mixed nominative-accusative and
which all subjects are assigned a single markerabsolutive-ergative features. This means that two
(nominative) distinctly from O (accusative); theways of organizing case marking and agreement
absolutive-ergative, in which Si and O have theoccur in ergative languages. More precisely,
same morphological marker (absolutive, usuallyergative languages have a split ergative pattern in
null), while a different marker is used for Stwhich some but not all transitive clauses are
(ergative); the tripartite (also three-way) withergative constructions. This phenomenon is called
three distinct markers (this system is relativelysplit ergativity, which it is to say that an agent is
rare); the neutral, in which the same markermarked for ergative case or left unmarked
(possibly null) is used for all three categories; anddepending on its position on the animacy
the horizontal (also double-oblique), in which St andhierarchy, or on the tense/aspect/mood of the
O are identically marked in opposition to Si (so farclause, or on the grammatical status of the
unattested). In short, according to case markingclause, whether it is main or subordinate, etc.
displayed by subjects and objects languages can