Government Backed Fraud in Academia

Contrary to the Hobbesian prediction of anarchyaggravated by a spreading notion in Western
(freedom) and brutish or unproductive results insociety that all opinions should be given equal
the event that elites (often termed 'beneficentweight and are valid until proven wrong. In this
paternalism') aren't fostered: we find lots ofPost-Modern democratization of ideas, utter
evidence that team play and open organizationalspeculation by the uninformed ranks alongside the
structure actually creates more civilized andreasoned hypotheses of scholars and other
productive governance. Lincoln Electric in Clevelandexperts in the field."(9)The Midwest Archaeology
is a well-documented example of how sharing theConference held at the Radisson in St. Paul,
wealth and responsibility builds communication andMinnesota in the November before this article was
profit. A Brazilian city named Porto Allegro thatprinted found a completely different and more
opened itself to citizen involvement and socialistcomplete investigational answer. They had only
ideals is flourishing as corruption wanes. It wasone 'debunker' dissenter who thought Wiseman
predicted they would fail financially but more thanmight be right. The historian with the records
a decade of good results has been the outcome.from the royal court of Norway. The top linguist
Singapore reduces government as a percentagewho showed the flaws in earlier scholarship. No
of GDP and is fully modernized. Instead ofone alive at the time this stone was discovered
'expertise' being the solution, it might well be thesecould have known what information was held
technocrats in bureaucracies are thewithin the syntax and vernacular usages of the
problem.Archaeology Magazine has a frequenttime it actually was written or inscribed. It was
contributor named Professor Wiseman whoshortly thereafter that scholars saw these things
comes under our critical gaze for all his fineyet it has been a hundred years and many books
'expertise'. He truly has struck a sore spot in ourhave been written. Three questionable witnesses
view of what is real about the Runestone athave said their father or grandfather forged the
Kensington. Most importantly he did his duty juststone. I guess you could liken them to jailhouse
after he was proven wrong in a conference ofconfessions but why did they need three
'experts' from many of his own colleagues as welldifferent 'confessors' when only one did it in each
as other disciplines. It was February, 2001 whencase? The chemical engineer and all the other
we read his 'Camelot in Kentucky' attack on thearchaeologists present at this meeting were
most speculative of all articles that hit theengaged in "utter speculation by the uninformed
newsstands in early 2001, about Europeans inranks" according to Prof. Wiseman and
America or Diffusionist History. Shortly thereafterArchaeology Magazine.There are people today
this organ of the gods of archaeology had a pieceengaged in ridiculing Farley Mowat because he is
on the natural landforms of the desert thatshowing how the Scots of St. Albans came here
became the Sphinx and Pyramids. No credit duebefore the Norse (if there is any difference
to man and science in ancient times is allowed, itbetween Pictish Scots and Gothic Norse) who
seems. In fact all of us are mere 'post-modernsettled L'Anse-aux-Meadows. You would think
speculative' trash as he would have it. We hit thethese people would know when they are beat,
ceiling and laughed simultaneously. Let's allow hisbut the BIG LIE affects a large percentage of
own words to prove our point (again)."Perhapspeople who never really evaluate the facts.
unwittingly, Stengel follows in the footsteps of theMowat was a key factor in the battle to get the
hyper-diffusionists, raising old hoaxes exposed longNorse point of view across in his book Westviking.
ago. He brings up once again the Kensington,One such ridiculer or paid hatchetman said Mowat
Minnesota, Rune Stone with its account ofhas no experience in the north of the Canadian
Scandinavian visitors in 1392, which over the pastArctic. My oldest brother's first wife's father was
century has been repeatedly rejected as aa missionary in the Arctic before becoming a
forgery by scholars, most recently by StephenChartered Accountant. He lived with Farley for
Williams, a curator emeritus of Harvard's Peabodytwo years there. Farley came to our lake and
Museum, in his book Fantasticvisited, but I never met him. Let me assure you
Archaeology...Refutation of baseless speculationthe experts often have no integrity. Their
{That is YOU, if you are thinking!} and repeatedexample is part of the reason why our kids lie
resurrection of previously exposed frauds andand cheat (on tests in American schools, Reader's
forgeries is a seemingly endless task. So it seemsDigest said 78% ADMIT cheating.) or grow up to
to the teachers who must explain year afterbe lawyers and politicians.Author of Diverse Druids
year to new groups of students that reports ofColumnist for The ES Press Magazine
Celtic inscriptions in the Precolumbian Midwest orGuest 'expert' at World-Mysteries.
Phoenicians in Brazil are false. The problem is